Peoples Geography — Reclaiming space

Creating people's geographies

Fisk on Putting Hatred On A Map

guernica-detail-adult-lamenting-child.jpgA very good Fisk piece on sectarianism and how the epistemological violence of imposed imperial cartographic division ultimately results in empirical, on the ground, violence. Put more simply, it is a good reminder of the politics of regional divide and conquer.

I’ve truncated it here and you can read it in full at the Independent. Boldface emphasis is mine.

Graphic: Detail from Picasso’s Guernica

How easy it is to put hatred on a map

Our guilt in this sectarian game is obvious. We want to divide our potential enemies

By Robert Fisk | The Independent | 3rd March 2007

Why are we trying to divide up the peoples of the Middle East? Why are we trying to chop them up, make them different, remind them – constantly, insidiously, viciously, cruelly – of their divisions, of their suspicions, of their capacity for mutual hatred? Is this just our casual racism? Or is there something darker in our Western souls?

Take the maps. Am I the only one sickened by our journalistic propensity to publish sectarian maps of the Middle East? You know what I mean. We are now all familiar with the colour-coded map of Iraq. Shias at the bottom (of course), Sunnis in their middle “triangle” – actually, it’s more like an octagon (even a pentagon) – and the Kurds in the north.

Or the map of Lebanon, where I live. Shias at the bottom (of course), Druze further north, Sunnis in Sidon and on the coastal strip south of Beirut, Shias in the southern suburbs of the capital, Sunnis and Christians in the city, Christian Maronites further north, Sunnis in Tripoli, more Shias to the east. How we love these maps. Hatred made easy.

Our guilt in this sectarian game is obvious. We want to divide the “other”, “them”, our potential enemies, from each other, while we – we civilised Westerners with our refined, unified, multicultural values – are unassailable. I could draw you a sectarian map of Birmingham, for example – marked “Muslim” and “non-Muslim” (there not being many Christians left in England – but no newspaper would print it. I could draw an extremely accurate ethnic map of Washington, complete with front-line streets between “black” and “white” communities but The Washington Post would never publish such a map.

Imagine the coloured fun The New York Times could have with Brooklyn, Harlem, the East River, black, white, brown, Italian, Catholic, Jew, Wasp. Or the Toronto Globe and Mail with French and non-French Canadian Montreal (the front line at one point follows the city Metro) or with Toronto (where “Little Italy” is now Ukrainian or Greek), and colour the suburb of Mississauga green for Muslim, of course. But we don’t draw these Hitlerian maps for our societies. It would be unforgivable, bad taste, something “we” don’t do in our precious, carefully guarded civilisation.

Passing a book stall in New York this week, I spotted the iniquitous Time magazine and there on the cover – and this might truly have been a 1930s Nazi cover – were two cowled men, one in black, the other largely hidden by a chequered scarf. “Sunnis vs Shi’ites,” the headline read. “Why they hate each other.” This, naturally, was a “take-out” on Iraq’s civil war – a civil war by the way, that America’s spokesmen in Baghdad were talking about in August 2003 when not a single Iraqi in his worst nightmares dreamt of what has now come to pass.

5 comments on “Fisk on Putting Hatred On A Map

  1. homeyra
    5 March, 2007

    Well said. I remember living in a Middle East where we wouldn’t “think” in terms of hatred.
    I think we must be mainly grateful to the “green belt” accessory when… let’s say some were “accessorized”!

  2. peoplesgeography
    5 March, 2007

    An excellent way of putting it. Let’s keep some “belts” out of Empire’s accessories!

  3. Manas
    5 March, 2007

    Very good document. I didn’t think about that.

  4. Keith
    5 March, 2007

    When you put it like that it is shocking!

    If those maps were to published to describe the said “western” cities most would expect right-wing movements to be behind them. Never mind the movements that can not wait to break Iraq up into more easy to manage pieces.

    But in the defence of the news media, they are trying to get a message/point across and pretty pictures tend to make the majority happy that they “understand” what is happening in the shortest time.

    I wonder what a sectarian map of the world would look like?

  5. Pingback: The Modern Women « Reflections

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Timely Reminders

"Those who crusade, not for God in themselves, but against the devil in others, never succeed in making the world better, but leave it either as it was, or sometimes perceptibly worse than what it was, before the crusade began. By thinking primarily of evil we tend, however excellent our intentions, to create occasions for evil to manifest itself."
-- Aldous Huxley

"The only war that matters is the war against the imagination. All others are subsumed by it."
-- Diane DiPrima, "Rant", from Pieces of a Song.

"It is difficult
to get the news from poems
yet men die miserably every day
for lack
of what is found there"
-- William Carlos Williams, "Asphodel, That Greeny Flower"